Posted to Lawyer You Know (RE: Civil Trial Plaintiff Abby Zwerner testifies) Uploaded 10/30/2025
Regarding the DM (crucial difference from a posted comment) sent to Taylor Swift I did not see clout chasing. However sending another DM (admittedly without me knowing any details) to another entertainer does give me pause (same time period?). Without knowing the plaintiff's history, did she often contact celebrities before the tragedy, it is difficult to make an impartial judgment. I will reduce this case to a simple equation, with awkward phrasing to avoid enraging those YT 'bots. The plaintiff was at work + asked for help + was grievously harmed due to inaction (aka administrative incompetence) = defendant liability...at least to me. BTW I do think that it is both WEIRD and prejudicial having the civil case heard BEFORE the criminal case. If the verdict finds for the defendant, can you imagine how the jurors will feel once they hear of the upcoming criminal cases? Will any of those jurors ever want to serve on a jury again?
Posted to NotActuallyGolden (RE: Pitt vs Jolie on their winery) Uploaded to YT 10/31/2025
"Traveling privilege", good indie band name or relevant in Pitt vs. Jolie😉? I would be quite interested in seeing a deep dive over this whining about a winery (sorry to all but I could NOT resist). Is the OG contract on the purchase/ownership of winery available to non-parties? Might be an interesting read. I agree with NotActuallyGolden, at this point I doubt that it is all about a winery. This has de-evolved into that familiar celebrity war pitting (again sorry, but not really sorry🤣) one former partner against the other. Result, allegedly, is legal firms seeing their net value rise while the litigants see their critical thinking skills fall.
Posted to Kjersti Flaa (RE: Entertainment News) Uploaded to You Tube on 10/31/2025
The Halloween mask was funny-horrible, but irregardless of the date it seems that every day is scary in Hollywood. The plaintiff's filing is somewhat hilarious in that it has likely extended the NYT involvement in this case. IMO they deserve one another...allegedly😉 Growing up with the privilege of a royal can be managed, looking at Anne and Edward (children of Queen Elizabeth) and William (son of King Charles), but with others the sense of entitlement seems to grow to unimaginable proportions clouding ethics and reality.
Posted to The Behavior Panel (RE:Prince Andrew stripped of his titles) Uploaded to YT 10/31/2025
At this point we ALL notice the body language and word salad. So here is some history. The man formerly know as Prince (no, not that Prince, a gifted singer) is now known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. Still sounds royal-ish, right? A search for Lord Mountbatten, beyond the way he was unalived, shows the "problematic" (wording sanitized for YT) life he led. Per AI: "The Windsor name was chosen for the English royals in 1917 by King George V to replace the German-sounding name Saxe-Coburg and Gotha due to anti-German sentiment during World War I. The name was taken from Windsor Castle, a historic royal residence, and was intended to be a more patriotic and English-sounding option." There you are smoke and mirrors, the royal version.😉
Posted to Rachel Masky (RE: Bat headband and cape) Uploaded to You Tube on 10/31/2025
I have a cosplay type hoodie also. In honor of my fav holiday season (love the cosplay, the candy and the no secret Santa/Yankee Swap/office, gifting) I decided to try it on. This resulted in one of my two cats to look at me with wide cartoony eyes wondering at the odd transformation of his human. While my other (older) cat gave me one of those stares indicating that I had placed last in his internal litany of mindless human tricks. That franken-cape (1/2 bat + 1/2 American Duchess) was beautiful. If bored try a fun psych experiment. Wear it in public with arms down and later with arms extended, who looks and who doesn't. (Maybe do not do that in front of security?) Perfect choice on the bat ears. They were evocative, spooky and CUTE.
