AUGUST 2025

Posted to Kjersti Flaa (RE: New Claims by BL) Uploaded to YT on 08/01/2025

I am only one organic (no implants, chips, cameras, recording devices or chest-bursting aliens) entity expressing one viewpoint. Before the events that began with the very odd PR of that now deeply ironically titled film, IEWU, I enjoyed films with appearances of BL and RR. I have not been a customer of any of their other products and services so I have no opinions on their efficacy or quality. My current intent is to NOT watch, buy tickets or purchase products with ownership of or endorsement by either  BL or RR. I apologize to their employees, but this is my opinion. I formed that opinion when I first learned about the subpoenas regarding the content creators.  In case any "legal observers" 😉  are watching, this is a link to The American Bar Association's "Model Rules of Professional Conduct: Preamble & Scope." Along with brushing up on the U.S. Constitution (I recommend: The Constitution Explained by David L. Hudson, Jr. J.D.), this link may also be helpful (NOTE: pay special attention to Model Rules points 5 and 9).  https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_preamble_scope/

Posted to Kjersti Flaa (RE: Interview with @SpiritualShift) Uploaded to You Tube on 08/01/2025

Extremely interesting followup with @SpiritualShift. Her advice for others going pro se to keep any contact with this legal firm via email is wise. With no recording of the meeting @SpiritualShift was right as should there be issues resulting from an unrecorded Zoom meeting it would come down to the word of 2 employees present against a sole content creator. Maybe I misunderstood what was said, but was the link that the legal firm referenced in their email to @SpiritualShift (spoken about@26:50 in this video) as being sent to Google only. WHAT ABOUT twitter? Does that mean twitter was NOT contacted? Admittedly this is the law firm that also told @SpiritualShift that it considers no information from content creators as actual information that is considered by this legal firm to be sufficient information to withdraw the subpoenas? THIS IS WILD.  Please have a great vacation in Norway with family.

Posted to Nate The Lawyer (RE: Macron vs Owens Civil Suit) Uploaded to YT on 08/02/2025

Nate, I do not know you beyond this channel but pain was quite evident in your voice. Noting the (as of this post) over 2600 comments to this video, people have OPINIONS. In trying to make sense of the chaos, some people may have a conflated these 2 circumstances: (1) an entertainment reporter who reviews a film before seeing it and (2) a legal channel creator's comments based solely on legal documents as filed by one side who represents the plaintiff or by the other side who represents the defendant. One is bad. One is good😜. However if an "edited" Owens doc is going to be submitted as evidence to the court in this civil case, we (I haven't seen it either) might have to at least FF through it to be up to speed...pun intended. I still find the whole underage thing somewhat sus, but those details are well-known in France. Those facts are not what is being adjudicated. Perhaps it is my conspiracy-ridden brain, but I sense (no not "a disturbance in the force"), but smoke and mirrors PR from all involved parties to this case.

Posted to Dave Neal (RE: Rush Hour Podcast - Interview w/ Lauren  @lethallauren904)  08/02/2025

Lauren is great, found her through the new/now usual way...the ill advised fishing expedition helmed by Captain Ahab clones 1, 2 and 3. ALLEGEDLY ('cause this group will sue anyone that uploads or posts their opinions) Number 3 Ahab clone is a certain legal firm with scant familiarity with the U.S. Constitution. While clones 1 and 2, ALLEGEDLY, are living in their own reality decorated with smoke and mirrors matched with zero understanding of how the internet in general or social media specifically works.

Posted to Kassidy O'Connell (RE: Latest communication pro se to Judge Limon) Uploaded 08/01/2025

This was a very comprehensive, well-researched and well-written letter. While I cannot see any reason for changes in this letter, judges can be finicky. Their reply of "DENIED" is often a way of indicating they want the next submission to tell it better and/or tell it with more precedents. Usually on pro se the court will give the filer more latitude. The court appreciates the filer showing respect for the process (no matter how you feel internally). Keep researching, keep all receipts & records while still caring for yourself. Keep communication with the court open and polite (which has been done). I look at legal plea writing as a covert game of submersing your inner emotions underneath the coverage of facts, logic, legal pleadings and citing relevant precedents. You are fantastic. All the content creators who are also fighting for free speech for us all... are fantastic. THANK YOU!

Posted to Law Offices of Andrew D. Myers (RE: KR property not being returned) Uploaded 08/02/2025

After watching the excellent interrogation of Adam Lally by defense attorney Rosemary C. Scapicchio, hearing the way the DA's (of Norfolk County) office is run or actually how it is NOT run, this non-return of property is of zero surprise. I agree with Andrew Myers in that beyond plain spite and incompetence is that the damage done by MSP to the Lexus may be even more extensive than mentioned in trial. Holding the car due to the upcoming civil suit, is NOT a legal option as far as I know. KR's original confiscated phone is likely mixed within a pile of other iPhones...somewhere? As for the other 2 phones confiscated in 2024 regarding the Aidan Kearney (aka Doctor Turtleboy) case, IMO those 2 cell phones have deliberately been withheld as these 2 cell phones were confiscated under a subpoena based on Kearney's case.  MSP does not wish to return even Kearney's own tech to Kearney after over one year.  BTW "WITDRAW" really?!   That word was in large font, bolded and easily identified as spelling challenged. Yes, all the WIT (and critical thinking) has been withdrawn, or perhaps re-homed?